← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23711/2025granted

Dhas Alis Jeyadhas v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep.By

2025-12-19Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 19.12.2025 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY CRL OP(MD)No.23711 of 2025 Dhas @ Jeyadhas ... Petitioner Vs.

The State, Rep.by the Inspector of Police, Kadaiyalumoodu Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

(Crime No.192 of 2025) ... Respondent For Petitioner : Mr.Russel Raj For Respondent : Mr.A.S.Abul Kalaam Azad Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Cr.No.192 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police.

ORDER: The Court made the following order :- The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Section 303(2) of BNS, 2023, in Crime No. 1/5

192 of 2025, on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that on 17.12.2025 at about 00.20 hours, while conducting vehicle check-up, the respondent police allegedly found that a Tata Tipper (610) bearing Registration No. TN-75-AS-6462 was transporting one unit of rough stone without a valid permit. The driver of the said vehicle ran away from the scene. Thereafter, the vehicle along with the rough stone was seized and produced before the respondent police. Hence, a case has been registered as against the petitioner.

3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and the petitioner has not committed any offence. He seeks this Court to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

4.The learned Government Advocate (Crl. side) appearing for the respondent submitted that the offences committed by the petitioner are serious in nature. Further, there is no previous case against the petitioner. 5.Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner with certain conditions. 2/5

6.Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of arrest or on his appearance, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the Learned Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithurai, Kanyakumari District, within a period of fifteen days from the date on which the order copy made ready and on further conditions that:

[a]the petitioner and the sureties shall affix their photographs and left thumb impression in the surety bond and the Magistrate may obtain a copy of their Aadhaar card or bank pass book to ensure their identity. [b]the petitioner shall report before the respondent police as and when required.

[c]the petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or witness either during investigation or trial.

[d]the petitioner shall not abscond either during investigation or trial. [e]On breach of any of the aforesaid conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to take appropriate action against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the conditions have been imposed and the petitioner is released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala 3/5

[(2005)AIR SCW 5560].

[f]If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of BNS.

19.12.2025 TMG TO

1. Judicial Magistrate No. I, Kuzhithura, Kanyakumari District.

2.The Inspector of Police, Kadaiyalumoodu Police Station, Kanyakumari District.

3.The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench Of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

S.SRIMATHY,J TMG

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23711 of 2025 Date : 19.12.2025 5/5