← Library
Madras High CourtCRL OP(MD)/23964/2025dismissed

Shiyam Sundar v. The State Of Tamilnadu Rep By, The Inspector Of Police,

2026-01-21Honourable Mrs Justice S.Srimathy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Criminal Jurisdiction ) Date : 21/01/2026 PRESENT The HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY Shiyam Sundar, S/o.Muruganadham, ... Petitioner/Accused Vs The State of Tamilnadu Rep By, the Inspector of Police, Ocu-Madruai, Cbcid-Ocu.

Crime No.6/2025.

... Respondent/Complainant For Petitioner : Mr.Vishnu V.

For Respondent : Mr.S.S.Manoj, Government Advocate (Crl.Side) PETITION FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL Under Sec.482 of BNSS PRAYER :- For Anticipatory Bail in Crime No.6/2025 on the file of the respondent police.

1/4

ORDER : The Court made the following order :- The petitioner / Accused who apprehends arrest in the hands of the respondent police for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 471 of IPC, in Crime No.6 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail.

2. The case of the prosecution is that the petitioner along with other accused persons had collected a sum of Rs.1,80,00,000/- from the defacto complainant for the investment to purchase iridium and earn more money and thereby cheated the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is an innocent person and he has not committed any offence as alleged by the prosecution. He further submitted that the petitioner was falsely implicated in this case. He further submitted that the petitioner is ready to abide by any stringent conditions that may be imposed by this Court. Hence, he seeks anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 2/4

4. The learned Government Advocate (Criminal Side) submitted that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and the investigation is still pending. Hence, he objected to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the fact that the petitioner has involved in very serious offence and the investigation is at initial stage. Therefore, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

7.Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. (S S Y J) 21.01.2026 TTA TO 1.The Inspector of Police, Ocu-Madruai, Cbcid-Ocu.

2. The Additional Public Prosecutor, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SRIMATHY,J TTA

ORDER

IN CRL OP(MD) No.23964 of 2025 Date : 21/01/2026 4/4