Seethalakshmi, (Died) v. P.Sriram @ Suresh

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.03.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N.SATHISH KUMAR and C.M.P.No.12925 of 2004 1.Seethalakshmi 2.R.Raman ...Appellants (Second Appellant is impleaded vide order dated 04.04.2013) Vs.

1.P.Sriram @ Suresh 2.Ambujam (died) 3.R.Parthasarathy 4.The Manager, Central Bank of India, Office at New No.1677, Sarangapani, East Street, Kumbakonam, Town and Munisif.

5.Ramalingam 6.M.Subramanian 7.Venkatakrishnan 8.Madhavan 9.Ragunatha Battachariar 10.Venkateswaran 11.Lakshmanan 12.Bhavani 13.Minor Prabhakar 14.Minor Rajkumar 1/4

15.Kanagambujam 16.Suresh 17.C.V.Raghavan 18.Jana Seshasayee 19.Radha 20.Raja Gopalan 21.Ramji 22.P.Jeyanthi

...Respondents

[R17 to R21were brought on record as lrs of the deceased second respondent vide order dated 18.06.2007] [R22 is brought on record as lrs of the deceased third respondent vide Court order dated 02.03.2020] PRAYER: This Appeal Suit is filed under Section 96 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 25.07.2003 made in O.S.No.48 of 2001 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Thanjavur. For Appellants : Mr. R.Balakumaran M/s.Sarvabhauman Associates For R15 & R16 : Mr.V.Chandrasekar For R22 : Mr.R.Rajaraman For R10 : No Appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel for the appellants reported 'no instructions', despite notice sent to the appellants.

2/4

3.Accordingly, the Appeal Suit is dismissed as abated. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.

09.03.2023 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No ta To 1.The Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court No.1, Thanjavur 2.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

N.SATHISH KUMAR , J.

ta Judgment made in 09.03.2023 4/4