← Library
Madras High CourtCRP/600/2002dismissed for default

v.

2024-02-28Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy4 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED :28.02.2024

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN Srimathy ... Petitioner Vs.

1.Karthick 2.Ayyappan 3.Sasi 4.Chinnamma Thomas alias Chinnan Marya Thomas (Died) 5.Krishnamma (Died) 6.Baby 7.Saji Thomas 8.K.Bagavathy 9.K.Geetha 10.Ramachandran 11.Mani 12.Ravi 1/4

13.Viji ... Respondents (7th respondent is brought on record as LR of the deceased 4th respondent vide Court order dated 01.02.2024 made in M.P.(MD).Nos.2 to 4 of 2011 in C.R.P.NPD.No.600 of 2002) (Respondents No.8 to 13 are brought on record as LRs of the deceased 5th respondent vide Court order dated 22.11.2023 made in C.M.P. (MD).No.1214 of 2022 in C.R.P.NPD.No.600 of 2002) PRAYER : Civil Revision Petition filed under Section 115 of Code of Civil Procedure, to set aside the Order and Decree made in E.A.No.120 of 1999 in E.P.No.105 of 1997 in O.S.No.16 of 1981 dated 07.01.2002, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram. For Petitioner :No appearance For Respondents :Mr.T.R.Rajaraman for R1 & R2 :No appearance for R3 & R6 :R4 & R5 Died

ORDER

This Civil Revision Petition has been filed against the Order and Decree made in E.A.No.120 of 1999 in E.P.No.105 of 1997 in O.S.No.16 of 1981 dated 07.01.2002, on the file of the Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram.

2/4

2. At the hearing on 16.02.2024, it was recorded that there was no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter is listed today under the caption for dismissal. Even today, there is no representation for the petitioner.

3. Therefore, this Civil Revision Petition stands dismissed for default.

28.02.2024 NCC :Yes / No Index :Yes / No Internet :Yes / No sbn To The Principal District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram.

3/4

K.K.RAMAKRISHNAN , J.

sbn 28.02.2024 4/4