Madras High CourtSA/1711/2000withdrawn dismissed

K.Inbalatha v. T.Dhanraj (Died)

2024-06-21Honourable Mr Justice S. Sounthar5 pages

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 21.06.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.K.Inbalatha 2.R.C.Krishnamoorthy 3.R.C.Kesavamoorthy (Died) 4.R.C.Ramamoorthy (Died) 5.A.Saradhamani 6.G.Geethamani (Died) 7.S.Prabha 8.M.Sharmala 9.J.Kishorekumar 10.J.Kalyanakumar 11.J.Rajakumar 12.K.Amaravathi 13.K.Vijay 14.R.Shapna 1/5

15.R.Inbalatha 16.K.Sona 17.Diana 18.S.Martina 19.A.Gnanadesigan 20.G.Raja Sundar 21.G.Daniel Pradeep Sundar 22.G.Naveen Sundar ... Appellants (Appellants 12 to 14 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased third appellant vide Court order, dated 27.06.2023 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.2727, 2728, 2776, 2777, 2795 and 2796 of 2022 in S.A.No.1711 of 2000) (Appellants 15 to 18 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased fourth appellant vide Court order, dated 27.06.2023 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.2727, 2728, 2776, 2777, 2795 and 2796 of 2022 in S.A.No.1711 of 2000) (Appellants 19 to 22 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sixth appellant vide Court order, dated 06.04.2022 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.2797 to 2799 of 2022 in S.A.No.

1711 of 2000) Vs.

1.T.Dhanaraj (Died) 2.Shenbagadevi 2/5

3.Pooja ... Respondents (Respondents 2 and 3 are brought on record as legal heirs of the deceased sole respondent vide Court order, dated 27.06.2023 made in C.M.P(MD)Nos.2727, 2728, 2776, 2777, 2795 and 2796 of 2022 in S.A.No.1711 of 2000) PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, to set aside the decree and judgment, dated 22.03.2000 rendered in A.S.No.41 of 1999 on the file of the Additional District Judge, Tuticorin in so far as the findings are concerned by reversing the decree and judgment, dated 22.01.1997 rendered in O.S.No.98 of 1992 on the file of the District Munsif of Srivaikundam by allowing this Second Appeal.

For Appellants : M/s.D.Sathya Sri For Respondents : No appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned Counsel appearing for the appellant made an endorsement seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the Second Appeal. Leave is granted. Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. 21.06.2024 3/5

NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes BTR To 1.The Additional District Judge, Tuticorin.

2.The District Munsif Court, Srivaikundam.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Record Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

4/5

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

BTR Judgment made in Dated:

21.06.2024 5/5