C.Rajagurusamy v. Ramasamy Naicker

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 10.02.2023

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.C.Rajagurusamy 2.Kandavel 3.C.Ramasubbu 4.C.Seethalakshmi 5.N.Badrakali 6.G.Sornammal ... Appellants/Plaintiffs Vs.

1.Ramasamy Naciker 2.Madasamy @ Mookan 3.Krishnasamy 4.Muthuramalingam 5.Perumal 6.Muthusamy 7.Chellaiah 8.Murugan 9.Ettappan 10.Pommunaicker 11.Manoharan 12.Avudaiappa Naicker

13. K.R.G. Sankarappan Naicker 14.K.R.G. Krishnasami Naicker 15.K.R.G. Rangasami Naicker 16.V.P.R. Sankarappa Naicker 17.G.Rajagopalnaciker 18.S.kandasamy 19.V.S.Rajammal 1/4

20.M. Thangavel 21.P.Selvaraj 22.Vellaiappan 23.G.Chellaiah 24.P.Krishnasamy 25.P.Karuppannan 26.Subbanaicker 27.A.Ramanuja Naicker 28.S.Kumbiyathever 29.E.Srnivasagam ... Respondents/Defendant PRAYER :- This Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.223 of 1996, dated 19.01.1999 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Tuticorin confirming the Judgment and Decree in O.S.No.453 of 1993, dated 30.04.1996 on the file of the Additional District Munsif, Tuticorin. For Appellants : No appearance

JUDGMENT

When the matter was taken up for hearing on 09.02.2023 the learned counsel appearing for the appellants reported "no instructions" and therefore, the Registry was directed to remove his name and print the name of 2/4

the appellants in the cause list. Today, the matter appeared in the cause list under the caption "for dismissal" and the names of the appellants are also printed. There is no representation on behalf of the appellants and hence, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 10.02.2023 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No trp To 1.The Principal District Judge, Tuticorin.

2. The Additional District Munsif, Tuticorin. 3.The Record Keeper, Vernacular Records, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SOUNTHAR, J.

trp 10.02.2023 4/4