Meyyar, S/O.Late Kathiravan, v. Ramu, S/O Palaiah,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 27.06.2024

CORAM

THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.SOUNTHAR 1.Meyyar 2.Subramanian ... Plaintiffs 1 & 2/ Respondents 1 & 2/ Appellants Vs.

1.Ramu 2.Thaivanai 3.Chandhra 4.Lakshmi ... Defendants 1 to 4/ Appellants 1 to 4/ Respondents PRAYER : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree passed in A.S.No.23 of 1999, dated 18.02.2000 on the file of the Sub Court, Pudukkottai reversing the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.430 of 1994, dated 31.07.1998 on the file of the Additional District Munsif Court, Pudukkottai.

1/4

For Appellants : No appearance For R-1 to R-3 : Mr.P.Thiagarajan

JUDGMENT

When the Second Appeal was taken up for hearing on 26.06.2024, the learned Counsel appearing for the appellant filed a Memo reporting 'No instruction'. Recording the same, the Registry was directed to remove the name of the learned Counsel, who entered appearance for the appellants and list the matter under the caption 'For Dismissal' by printing the names of the appellants.

2. Today the Second Appeal is listed under the caption 'For Dismissal' by printing the names of the appellants. Even today, there is no representation for the appellants.

3. The learned Counsel for the respondents 1 to 3 is present.

4. Hence, the Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.

27.06.2024 2/4

NCC :

Yes / No Index :

Yes / No Internet :

Yes BTR To 1.The Sub Court, Pudukkottai.

2.The Additional District Munsif Court, Pudukkottai.

3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Record Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

3/4

S.SOUNTHAR , J.

BTR Judgment made in Dated:

27.06.2024 4/4