Pal Thangam, v. Roselet,

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 25.07.2025

CORAM:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE R.VIJAYAKUMAR Pal Thangam ... Appellant/1st Respondent Plaintiff Vs.

1. Roselet

2. Snegamani ... Respondents 1 and 2/ Appellants/Defendants 5 and 6

3. Chellammal

4. Nesaiyan

5. Chelladurai

6. Kamalammal

7. Nesamony ... Respondents 3 to 7/ Respondents 2 to 6/ Respondents 2, 3, 4,7 & 8 PRAYER: Second Appeal is filed under Section 100 of C.P.C., against the decree and judgment in A.S.No.59/99 dated 18.11.2002 by the learned Subordinate Judge, Padmanabhapuram, reversing the decree and judgment dated 22.03.1999 made in O.S.No.322 of 1984 by the learned Additional District Munsif, Padmanabhapuram.

1/4

For Appellant : No appearance For Respondents : No appearance

J U D G M E N T

Though the appeal was listed on 24.07.2025, there was no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, the appeal is listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". Even today, there is no representation on the side of the appellant. Hence, this Second Appeal stands dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. 25.07.2025 NCC : Yes/No Index : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No ebsi 2/4

To

1. The Sub-Court, Padmanabhapuram.

2. The Additional District Munsif Court, Padmanabhapuram.

3/4

R.VIJAYAKUMAR,J.

ebsi 25.07.2025 4/4