John Mary v. Perish Priest

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 11.08.2023

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY John Mary ...Appellant vs.

1.Parish Priest 2.Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Dindigul.

3.The Government of Tamil Nadu, Through the District Collector, Dindigul District, Dindigul.

... Respondents Prayer: Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure against the Judgment and Decree dated 30.03.2001 in A.S.No. 20 of 1998 on the file of the Principal District Judge, Dindigul confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 07.01.1998 in O.S.No.1091 of 1994 on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Dindigul. For Appellant :

No appearance For Respondent :

No appearance

JUDGMENT

The learned counsel appearing for the appellant submits that the sole appellant passed away long before.

2. Though the learned counsel for the appellant submits that the sole appellant died long before, till date, he has not taken any steps to bring on record the legal representatives of the deceased sole appellant. In view of the same, the Second Appeal is dismissed as abated. No costs. 11.08.2023 NCC:Yes/No Index:Yes/No Speaking/Non-speaking order mbi To 1.The Principal District Judge, Dindigul 2.The Principal District Munsif, Dindigul 3.The Section Officer, Vernacular Records Section, Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai.

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY , J.

mbi 11.08.2023