Irulappan(Died) v. Manoharan
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT ( Civil Appellate Jurisdiction ) Friday, the Twenty Sixth day of July Two Thousand and Twenty Four PRESENT The Hon`ble Mr.Justice S.SOUNTHAR C.M.P.No.4209 of 2004 in S.A.No.518 of 2004 1 IRULAPPAN(DIED) 2 NAGAPPAN, 3 GURUSWAMI, 4 CHIDAMBARAM 5 IRULAYEE AMMAL 6 IRULAYEE 7 PALANIAMMAL 8 SARAVANAN 9 PERIASWAMI ... PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS 10 SUNDARI, 11 I.NAGARAJAN, 12 I.SUNDARAVEL, 13 I.KARTHIKEINI, 1/4
14 I.SENTHIL LAKSHMI, ... PETITIONERS 10 TO 14 (PETITIONERS 10 TO 14 ARE BROUGHT ON RECORD AS LRs OF THE DECEASED 1st PETITIONER VIDE COURT ORDER DATED 05.07.2021 MADE IN CMP(MD)Nos.1866,1868 and 1869 of 2024 IN SA.No.518 of 2004) Vs 1 MANOHARAN 2 ALAGAR 3 VENKATARAMAN, 4 SUBRAMANI @ MANI, 5 SAKKARAI RAJ 6 PALANISWAMI 7 POLAPPAN 8 MINOR NAGALAKSHMI 9 MINOR THIRUPATHY (MINOR RESPONDENTS 8 & 9 ARE REP.BY 7th RESPONDENT) 10 KALIAMMAL 11 P.NAGAKKAL 12 MARIAMMAL 13 MEENAKSHI AMMAL 14 R.NAGAKKAL 2/4
15 KATHIRAMMAL 16 VELLAIAMMAL 17 UNNAMALAI AMMAL 18 NAGAMUTHU AMMAL ... RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENTS Civil Miscellaneous Petition filed praying that in the circumstances stated therein and in the affidavit filed therewith the High Court may be pleased to grant an order of injunction restraining the respondents, their men and agents from intefering with their peaceful possession and enjoyment of the suit property the subject matter of OS NO.1249/1994 on the file of II Additional District Munsif, Dindigul pending disposal of the Second Appeal.
PRAYER IN S.A.No.518 of 2004:
To prefer this Memorandum of Grounds of Second Appeal to this Hon`ble Court against the Decree and Judgment of the Court of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Dindigul, made in A.S.No.44 of 2001, dated 19.12.2003, reversing the Decree and Judgment of the Court of the II Additional District Munsif, Dindigul made in O.S.No.1249 of 1994 dated 31.7.2000.
ORDER : This Civil Miscellaneous Petition coming up for orders on this day, upon perusing the petition and the affidavit filed in support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of M/S.G.GOMATHI SANKAR, Advocate for the petitioner and of Mr.A.SARAVANAN, Advocate on behalf of the 1st Respondent, the court made the following order:- The petitioners seek an order of injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the petitioners' possession over the suit property. 3/4
It is seen from the records that there has been no interim order for the past 20 years. Hence, this Civil Miscellaneous Petition is dismissed. sd/- 26/07/2024 / TRUE COPY / /07/2024 Sub-Assistant Registrar ( C.S. I / II / III / IV ) Madurai Bench of Madras High Court, Madurai - 625 023.
DIXIT TO 1 THE ADDITIONAL SUBORDINATE JUDGE, DINDIGUL, 2 THE II ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MUNSIF, DINDIGUL ORDER IN C.M.P.No.4209 of 2004 in S.A.No.518 of 2004 Date :26/07/2024 SA/JGB/SAR. /30.07.2024/4P/3C Madurai Bench of Madras High Court is issuing certified copies in this format from 17/07/2023. 4/4