The State Repesented By v. M.Rayappan @ George
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 09.04.2025
CORAM:
THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE J.NISHA BANU AND THE HONOURABLE MRS.JUSTICE S.SRIMATHY & C.M.P.(MD)No.6028 of 2025 1.The State rep. by, The District Collector, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil Post, Kanyakumari District.
2.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Padmanabhapuram, Thuckalay Post, Kanyakumari District.
3.The Tahsildar, Killiyoor Taluk, Tolaiyavattam Post, Kanyakumari District.
4.The Assistant Director of Survey, Kanyakumari District, Nagercoil Post, Kanyakumari District.
... Appellants -VsM.Rayappan @ George ... Respondent
PRAYER: Appeal filed under Clause 15 of Letters Patent, praying this Court to set aside the order dated 30.07.2024 made in W.P.(MD)No.17651 of 2024 on the file of this Court.
For Appellants : Mrs.D.Farjana Ghoushia, Special Government Pleader For Respondent : Mr.V.Anthony Elangovan Raj
JUDGMENT
[Judgment of the Court was delivered by J.NISHA BANU, J.] This Writ Appeal is directed against the order dated 30.07.2024 made in W.P.(MD)No.17651 of 2024.
2.It is the case of the respondent / writ petitioner that the land in Re.Survey No.188/2 Part, Palur Village, Vilavancode Taluk, now Mullanganavilai Village, Killiyoor Taluk, Kanyakumari District is the patta land of the writ petitioner. However, it is wrongly mentioned as poramboke land in the revenue records. Therefore, he made several representations to correct the revenue records. Since they have not been considered, he filed the said Writ Petition. 3.The Writ Court, vide order dated 30.07.2024, disposed of the said Writ Petition, directing the 1st respondent to dispose of the representation made by the
writ petitioner within a period of four months from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. Aggrieved by the same, the appellants have filed this Writ Appeal. 4.Heard the learned counsel on either side and perused the materials available on record carefully.
5.On perusal of the impugned order passed by the Writ Court, we are of the view that it is only a direction to consider the representation made by the writ petitioner. Therefore, we are not inclined to interfere with the order impugned herein. Accordingly, this Writ Appeal is dismissed. No costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
[J.N.B., J.] & [S.S.Y., J.] 09.04.2025 NCC : Yes / No Index : Yes / No Yuva
J.NISHA BANU, J.
AND S.SRIMATHY, J.
Yuva 09.04.2025