The Secretry v. Chitra S
BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED: 04.06.2025
CORAM
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE G.R.SWAMINATHAN and THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR and C.M.P(MD)No.7842 of 2025 1.The Secretary, Education Department, Fort St.George, Chennai - 600 009.
2.The Director, The Elementary Education, DPI Campus, Chennai - 600 006.
3.The District Education Officer, The Elementary Education Department, Madurai District - 625 002.
4.The Block Development Officer, The Elementary Education Department, Madurai East, Madurai District - 625 020.
... Appellants / Respondents 1 to 4 Vs.
1.S.Chitra ... 1st Respondent / Writ Petitioner 1/6
2.The Assistant Director, State Government of Audit Department, Madurai Region, Pankajam Colony, Teppakulam, Madurai - 625 009.
... 2nd Respondent / 5th Respondent Prayer: Writ Appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent to set aside the order dated 22.07.2024 in W.P(MD)No.16159 of 2024 and allow the Writ Appeal.
For Appellants : Mr.C.Venkatesh Kumar Special Government Pleader For Respondents : Mr.K.Muthu Ganesa Pandian
JUDGMENT
(Judgment of the Court was made by G.R.Swaminathan J.) Heard both sides.
2.The first respondent herein joined the Education Department as Secondary Grade teacher in the year 1984. She got selection grade in the year 1994. She became elementary school Headmistress in the year 2000. She got 2/6
selection grade in the year 2004. She became Middle School Headmistress in the year 2009. She got selection grade in the year 2019. She voluntarily retired from service on 31.05.2023. While so, the Block Educational Officer, Elementary Education Department, Madurai East, Madurai passed order dated 29.04.2024 directing recovery of a sum of Rs.18,29,480/- (Rupees Eighteen Lakhs Twenty Nine Thousand Four Hundred and Eighty only) from her. According to the Department, her pay fixation was erroneously done with effect from 01.07.2006.
3.Challenging the recovery order, the first respondent herein filed W.P(MD)No.16159 of 2024. The Writ Petition was allowed by the learned single Judge and the recovery order was set aside by applying the well known White Washer's case (State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih). Questioning the order dated 22.07.2024 whereby W.P(MD)No.16159 of 2024 is allowed, the Department has filed this Writ Appeal.
4.There is no serious dispute that the pay of the first respondent was erroneously fixed. The only question that calls for consideration is whether when the first respondent was not at fault, recovery could be ordered at this point of time. It is true that the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the decision reported 3/6
in (2015) 4 SCC 334 (State Of Punjab & Ors vs Rafiq Masih) had held that recovery from the employees when the excess payment has been made for a period in excess of 5 years, it is impermissible. But then, this is a continuing cause of action. Therefore, while the excess payment made form the year 2006 to 2019 cannot be ordered to be recovered, the excess payment received by the first respondent for the period of 5 years prior to 29.04.2024 can very well be ordered to be recovered and the parameter laid down in the White Washer's case may not come to the first respondent's rescue. The order is accordingly modified. We permit the appellants to recover the excess payment received by the writ petitioner / first respondent herein for a period of 5 years prior to 29.04.2024. The first respondent will pay only the refixed pension amount with effect from 29.04.2024.
5.This Writ Appeal is partly allowed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected miscellaneous petition is closed. [G.R.S., J.] [K.R.S., J.] 04.06.2025 NCC : Yes / No Internet : Yes / No Index : Yes / No MGA 4/6
To The Assistant Director, State Government of Audit Department, Madurai Region, Pankajam Colony, Teppakulam, Madurai - 625 009.
5/6
G.R.SWAMINATHAN, J and K.RAJASEKAR, J.
MGA 04.06.2025 6/6