R.Mayilan v. The Authorized Officer /

BEFORE THE MADURAI BENCH OF MADRAS HIGH COURT DATED : 06.01.2025

CORAM

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.S. RAMESH AND THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE A.D.MARIA CLETE and WMP(MD) No.26237 of 2024 R.Mayilan ... Petitioner Vs

1. The Authorized Officer /, Chief Manager, State Bank of India, SME Branch, Thuvakudi, Trichy 15.

2. The Branch Manager, State Bank of India, Siruthozhi Branch, Thuvakudi, Trichy.

... Respondents PRAYER :- Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, praying this Court to issue of Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records relating to the impugned notice dated 22.11.2024 issued by the 1st respondent and quash the same as illegal and 1/3

unconstitutional consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to formulate a revival and rehabilitation scheme for the petitioners unit as per the MSME-Development Act 2006.

For Petitioner : Ms.J.Shakila For Respondents : Mr.C.Deepak

ORDER

The appropriate forum to redress the grievance put forth in this writ petition would be the Debt Recovery Tribunal, Madurai. When such an alternative remedy is available, it would not be justifiable to entertain the present writ petition. Accordingly, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach the Debt Recovery Tribunal for redressal of his grievances.

2. With the above liberty, the writ petition stands dismissed. No costs. Consequently connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. [M.S.R.,J] [A.D.M.C.,J] 06.01.2025 NCC : Yes/No RR 2/3

M.S. RAMESH , J.

AND A.D.MARIA CLETE, J.

RR

ORDER

IN WP(MD) No.31340 of 2024 Date : 06.01.2025 3/3