← Library
High Court of KeralaArb.A/58/2012settled

M/S.Westfort Hospital v. T.S.Sanil

2015-01-27Honourable Smt. Justice P.V.Asha,Honourable Mr.Justice T.R.Ramachandran Nair2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE T.R.RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & THE HONOURABLE SMT. JUSTICE P.V.ASHA TUESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/7TH MAGHA, 1936 Arb.A.No. 58 of 2012 () ------------------------ AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OPARB 1327/2009 of I ADDL.DISTRICT COURT, ERNAKULAM DATED 27-08-2011 APPELLANT(S)/ PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS:

--------------------------------------------------------------------- -

1. M/S.WESTFORT HOSPITAL WESTFORT THRISSUR -4 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING PARTNER K.M.MOHANDAS.

2. K.M.MOHANDAS, AGED 56 YEARS S./O.MAMMU, RESIDING AT XXI/229, SREENIDHI THRISSUR -4.MANAGING PARTNER, M/S WESTFORT HOSPITAL WEST FOR HOSPITAL WESTFORT, THRISSUR -4.

3. JAYASRRE MOHANDAS, AGED 50 YEARS W/O.K.M.MOHANDAS, RRESIDING AT ---DO---DO-- BY ADVS.SMT.SUMATHY DANDAPANI (SR.) SRI.MILLU DANDAPANI RESPONDENT(S)/RESPONDENT CLAIMANT:

-------------------------------------------------------------------- T.S.SANIL, AGED 37 YEARS S/O.T.A SURENDRAN , PROPRIETOR M/S SILPA CONSTRUCTIONS, NORTH SQUARE 4TH FLOOR PARAMARA ROAD, KOCHI-18, RESIDING AT THANDASSERY HOUSE VADUTHALA, CHERANELLOOR VILLAGE, KANAYANNUR TALUK. R1 BY ADV. SRI.P.K.RAVISANKAR THIS ARBITRATION APPEALS HAVING BEEN FINALLY HEARD ON 2701-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR & P.V. ASHA, JJ.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Arb. A. No.58 of 2012 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of January, 2015

JUDGMENT

Ramachandran Nair, J.

The disputes between the parties have been settled as evident from the mediation settlement agreement forwarded by the learned Mediator. We have perused the agreement. It is submitted by the learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellants that the third appellant had given due authorisation to appellant No.2 and appellant No.1 is already represented by appellant No.2. In the light of the settlement, we record it and it is made clear that the terms of settlement will form part of this judgment. The appeal is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (T.R. RAMACHANDRAN NAIR, JUDGE.) (P.V. ASHA, JUDGE.) kav/