← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./432/2015dismissed

Gopi v. State Of Kerala

2015-01-29Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA THURSDAY, THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY 2015/9TH MAGHA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 432 of 2015 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO. 2085/2014 OF MANNAR POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA ------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED:-:

------------------------------------ GOPI, AGED 67 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDAN, ATTUKADAVIL VEEDU, CHERUKOLE MURI, CHENNITHALA.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.SUNIL KUMAR SMT.A.SALINI LAL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANTS:-:

---------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. SREEJITH V.S.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 29-01-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No.432 of 2015 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 29th day of January, 2015

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.2085/2014 of Mannar Police Station registered for the offence punishable under Section 376 IPC.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 29.12.2014 at 3.30 p.m. he called a 90 year old woman, who is the mother-in-law of the defacto complainant, into his house and he forcibly committed rape on her. The petitioner has been in custody for the period from 30.12.2014 onwards.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

The contents of the CD prima facie reveal the complicity of the petitioner. The allegations against the

BA.432/2015 : 2 :

petitioner are very grave and serious. The inhuman conduct on the part of the petitioner does not permit this Court to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Considering the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner, I am of the view that the petitioner is not entitled to be enlarged on bail. In the result, this Bail Application is dismissed. Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/29/01 // True Copy // PA to Judge