Lijo, S/O.Jose v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2015/8TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 930 of 2015 () ------------------------------ CRIME NO. (NOT KNOWN) OF VARAPPUZHA POLIE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT -------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED :

--------------------------------- LIJO, S/O.JOSE AGED 31 YEARS, KALATHILPARAMBIL, VARAPPUZHA, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT- PIN - 683 517.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.J.MOHAMMED ANZAR SRI.A.D.SURESH BABU RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT :

----------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, PIN - 682 031.

2. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, VARAPPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT PIN - 683 517.

R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SREEJITH V.S. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-02-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

bp

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.930 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of February, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

This petition has been filed by the petitioner who apprehends that he will be arrested by the second respondent on the accusation that he has committed some non-bailable offences against one Suni.

2.

The learned Public Prosecutor submits that the second respondent has not registered any case against the petitioner on the basis of the complaint lodged by Suni. 3.

The learned counsel submits that the second respondent summoned the petitioner to the police station. 4.

Having regard to the facts of the case, it is sufficient to record that the second respondent shall comply with Section 41A Cr.P.C. if a case is registered against the petitioner.

B.A. No.930 of 2015 -2In the result, with the above direction this application is dismissed.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE shg/