Sevier v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/19TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 1004 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 374/2014 OF VANDANMEDU POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT. ........

PETITIONERS/ACCUSED :

------------------------------------- SEVIER, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O. JOSEPH, PUTHEN PURAKKAL, MANIYAM PETTY, NETTITHOZHOO, VANDANMEDU, IDUKKI.

BY ADV. SRI.BINDU SREEKUMAR.

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT/STATE :

---------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, COCHIN-31.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE , SHO, VADANMEDU POLICE STATION, IDUKKI DISTRICT-685 551.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SREEJITH. V.S.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No.1004 of 2015 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 10th day of March, 2015

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petition under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.374/2014 of Vandanmedu Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 450 and 436 IPC.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he has committed house trespass into the house of the de facto complainant woman, who is his mother-in-law, on 11.07.2014 at 3.30 p.m. with an intention to commit an offence punishable with imprisonment for life and set ablaze almost all the household articles including TV, cot and clothes in the bedroom of the house. The said articles caught fire which spread onto the roof of the house, whereby the house as such was gutted in fire. 4.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and

BA.1004/2015 : 2 :

learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

The contents of the CD prima facie reveal the complicity of the petitioner. The allegations against the petitioner are very grave and serious. Considering the seriousness of the allegations against the petitioner, I am of the view that this is not a fit case wherein anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner.

In the result, this bail application is dismissed. Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/11/03 // True Copy // PA to Judge