Sadhik P.M v. The State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA TUESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/19TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 1026 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 359/2015 OF MANJERI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ......

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------ SADHIK P.M., S/O.MUHAMMED, AGED 20 YEARS, PARAMBAN MELEYIL HOUSE, PERUMBALAM, ANAKKAYAM, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.BABU S. NAIR, SRI.K.RAKESH.

RESPONDENTS/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------------------------

1. THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI-682 031.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MANJERI POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT, PIN-676 121.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.SREEJITH. V.S.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

B.KEMAL PASHA, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No.1026 of 2015 C - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 10th day of March 2015

ORDER

Application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2.

According to the petitioner, he is apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.359 of 2015 of Manjeri Police Station, Malappuram district registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 20 and 21 of the Kerala Protection of River Banks and Regulation of Removal of Sand Act, 2001.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 17.2.2015 at 22.15 hours, he was found transporting sand, by an autorikshaw bearing registration number KL-10-H-8965 and that the said sand was illegally collected without any authority. On seeing the police,

B.A.1026/2015 the petitioner, who was driving the autorikshaw, ran away from the spot, after leaving the autorikshaw with the load of sand. 4.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the CD.

5. The investigation of this case is practically over. No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner. There is nothing to be recovered from the petitioner, as the vehicle and the sand have been seized. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that this is a fit case wherein anticipatory bail can be granted to the petitioner. In the result, this bail application is allowed and the investigating officer or such other police officer, who is conducting the arrest of the petitioner, is directed to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of his arrest on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the officer

B.A.1026/2015 conducting arrest, and subject to the following terms and conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall report before the investigating officer in between 09.00 a.m. and 11.00 a.m. on all Tuesdays and Fridays, commencing from 17.3.2015 for a period of three months or till the filing of the final report in this case, whichever is earlier.

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.

(iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the investigating officer. (iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any offence while on bail.

It is made clear that the violation of any of the conditions stipulated above will result in the cancellation of bail. Sd/- B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE dl // TRUE COPY // PA to Judge