← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./1174/2015allowed

Sundar Raj v. Excise Inspector

2015-03-06Honourable Mr. Justice B.Kemal Pasha4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE B.KEMAL PASHA FRIDAY, THE 6TH DAY OF MARCH 2015/15TH PHALGUNA, 1936 Bail Appl..No. 1174 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 19/2015 OF SULTHAN BATHERY EXCISE RANGE, WAYANAD DISTRICT ---------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED :

--------------------------------------- SUNDAR RAJ, AGED 34 YEARS, S/O. KRISHNAN, AMMANKAVU HOUSE, KOLAPPALLY P.O., CHERAMKODE VILLAGE, PANDALLUR TALUK, WAYNAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.T.G.RAJENDRAN RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT/STATE :

------------------------------------------------------------------

1. THE EXCISE INSPECTOR, SULTHAN BATHERY EXCISE RANGE, WAYNAD DISTRICT-672 561.

2. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 06-03-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

B. KEMAL PASHA, J.

````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` B.A. No.1174 of 2015 ````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` Dated this the 6th day of March, 2015

O R D E R

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.19/2015 of Sulthan Bathery Excise Range registered for the offence punishable under Section 55(a) of the Abkari Act. 3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that on 11.02.2015 at 4.30 p.m., he was found transporting 12.690 litres of IMFL meant for sales in the State of Karnataka only, by a KSRTC bus, in contravention of the provisions of the Abkari Act. The petitioner has been in custody for the period from 11.02.2015 onwards.

4.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

5.

No criminal antecedents have been reported against the petitioner. It seems that the investigation of this

BA.1174/2015 : 2 :

case is practically over. The continued detention of the petitioner in custody is not required for the continued investigation of this case. Considering the facts and circumstances of this case and having regard to the period undergone by the petitioner in custody and the present stage of investigation, I am satisfied that the petitioner can be enlarged on bail.

6.

In the result, this Bail Application is allowed and the petitioner shall be enlarged on bail on his executing a bond for `1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each to the satisfaction of the concerned Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, and subject to the following terms and conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall report before the Investigating Officer in between 9 a.m. and 11 a.m. on all Fridays and Tuesdays, commencing from 13.03.2015 for a period of three months or till the filing of the final report in this case, whichever is earlier.

(ii) The petitioner shall not tamper with the evidence or influence witnesses.

BA.1174/2015 : 3 :

(iii) The petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation as and when required by the Investigating Officer.

(iv) The petitioner shall not involve in any offence while on bail.

It is made clear that the violation of any of the conditions stipulated above will result in the cancellation of bail.

Sd/- (B.KEMAL PASHA, JUDGE) aks/06/03 // True Copy // PA to Judge