Saidalavi M.A. v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF MAY 2015/22ND VAISAKHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 1417 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 578/2014 OF SREEKANDAPURAM POLICE STATION,WAYANAD DISTRICT ------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:

----------------------------------------------- SAIDALAVI M.A., S/O.LATE AHAMMED, AGED 46 YEARS, MANGALATHODUKAYIL HOUSE, NADAVAYAL POST, KANIYAMBETTA PANCHAYATH, VYTHIRI TALUK,WAYANAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.A.C.DEVY RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. LALIZA.T.Y.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

--------------------------------------- B.A. No. 1417 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of May, 2015

ORDER

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the second accused in Crime No. 578/2014 of Sreekandapuram Police Station registered for the offences under Sections 420 and 403 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that the first accused, who had already married produced some false certificates, so that he may marry again.

3. Heard. The allegation against the petitioner is that he assisted the first accused. The first accused had already been arrested. Having regard to the facts, I am satisfied that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for effective investigation.

In the result, this application is allowed.

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for

B.A. No. 1417 of 2015 the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

2) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.

3) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DMR/-