Soorath v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/15TH JYAISHTA, 1937 BAIL APPL..NO. 2340 OF 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 426/2015 OF KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

......

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

----------------------------------------- SOORATH, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.SURENDRAN, 'GULAB', ASARIMUKKU, CHEMMARUTI, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN.

RESPONDENTS/STATE /COMPLAINANT:

-----------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM- 682 031.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KALLAMBALAM POLICE STATION, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM DISTRICT-695 605.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN. THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 05-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

---------------------- Bail Appl. No.2340 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 5th day of June 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Secs.308, 323, 324 and 341 read with Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code.

3. Heard both sides.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 06.04.2015 and he may be granted bail.

4. Having regard to the nature of allegation and the period of custody, I am inclined to grant his prayer. In the result, the bail application is allowed.

1. The petitioner will be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned.

2. He shall appear before the investigating

Bail Appl. No.2340 of 2015 2 officer between 10.00 a.m and 11.00 a.m. on every Wednesd ay for four months, or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier.

3. He shall not threaten or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall he get himself involved in any criminal case.

4. He shall not destroy or attempt to destroy the evidence or interfere with the investigation. If the petitioner violates any of the above conditions, the court of enquiry/trial is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge