Pillayadi Jayakrishnan v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 22ND DAY OF MAY 2015/1ST JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2365 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 127/2015 OF ULIKKAL POLICE STATION. .....

PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.2:

------------------------------------------- PILLAYADI JAYAKRISHNAN, AGED 44 YEARS, S/O.PATTATHIL KESAVAN NAMBIAR, PANAPUZHA AMSOM, PARAVOOR DESOM, PANAPUZHA P.O., KANNUR DISTRICT. BY ADV. SRI.IEANS.C.CHAMAKKALA.

RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN-682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA. R.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 22-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

rs.

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

............................................

B.A. No.2365 of 2015 (A) ............................................... Dated this the 22nd day of May, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the second accused in Crime No. 127 of 2015 of Ulikkal Police Station registered for the offence under section 420 IPC.

3. The allegation is that the first accused entered into an agreement with the first informant for sale of a shop room and received a certain amount towards the sale consideration, but, later, he executed a sale deed in favour of the petitioner and thus he and the other accused cheated the first informant.

4. Heard

5. This case originated with the filing of a private complaint. The dispute is essentially of a civil nature. So I am inclined to grant the prayer for anticipatory bail. In the result, this application is allowed.

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after

B.A. No.2365 of 2015 (A) ::2::

interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs. Twenty five thousand only with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

2) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he are so required by him in writing.

3) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. o Judge