Sooraj v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2374 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 573/2015 OF TOWN EAST POLICE STATION, TRISSUR DISTRICT --------------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS. 1 & 2 :
-------------------------------------------------
1. SOORAJ P.R., AGED 35 YEARS, S/O RAMAKRISHNAN, PERUMBAKULAM HOUSE, OMBATHUNGAL DESOM, MATTATHUR VILLAGE, CHALAKKUDY TALUK,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2. SANTHOSH PAPPACHAN, AGED 30 YEARS, S/O PAPPACHAN, MULLAPARAMBHIL HOUSE, MULAMKUNNATHU KAVU DESOM, KILLANNUR VILLAGE, THRISSUR TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.M.J.POLLY RESPONDNET/COMPLAINANT :
------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, THRISSUR TOWN EAST POLICE STATION.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S. SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
bp
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
............................................
B.A. No. 2374 of 2015 ............................................... Dated this the 25th day of May, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioners are said to have committed the offences under sections 323, 325, 341 and 354 of IPC. They allegedly assaulted the victim with hands causing fracture of the bone of the left finger.
3. Heard.
4. The prosecution has no case that the petitioners used any weapon. Section 354 IPC does not find any place in the FI Statement. It was later incorporated. Custodial interrogation of the petitioners is not necessary for effective investigation.
In the result, this application is allowed.
1) The petitioners shall be released on bail after interrogation on their executing a bond for Rs. Twenty five thousand only each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if they are arrested by the Police in connection with this case.
2) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if they are so required by him in writing.
3) They shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.
B.A. No. 2374 of 2015 ::2::
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. o Judge