← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./2377/2015dismissed

Siril v. State Of Kerala

2015-05-25Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF MAY 2015/4TH JYAISHTA, 19372 Bail Appl..No. 2377 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 660/2015 OF CHALAKKUDY POLICE STATION ,THRISSUR DISTRICT ---------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------- SIRIL THOMAS, AGED 26 YEARS,S/O.THOMAS, KANNAYI HOUSE, MOTHIRAKKANNI DESOM, PARIYARAM VILLAGE, CHALAKKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.M.J.POLLY RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, CHALAKKUDY POLICE STATION. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. R.REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

............................................

B.A. No. 2377 of 2015 (B) ............................................... Dated this the 25th day of May, 2015

O R D E R

Petitioner is the first accused in Crime No. 660 of 2015 of Chalakkudy Police Station registered for the offences under sections 143, 148, 452, 323, 324, 326 and 308 r/w section 149 IPC. The allegation is that he along with the co-accused armed with deadly weapons like chopper and sticks formed themselves into an unlawful assembly and assaulted the victim with the weapons causing him serious injuries.

2. Heard

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner also sustained injuries in the incident and the police have registered Crime No. 661 of 2015 against the victim and the co-accused in this case have already been granted anticipatory bail by the Sessions Judge. The wound certificate of the victim shows that he sustained injuries on the neck and a part of his ear was cut off. The injuries sustained the victim are very serious. The allegation of the prosecution that he was assaulted with a chopper prima facie appears to be true.

B.A. No. 2377 of 2015 ::2::

The weapon has so far not been recovered. It was the petitioner who allegedly inflicted the injuries. He is involved in another case, crime 503 of 2014. It is not at all proper to grant him anticipatory bail.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner will surrender before the Investigating Officer he may do so if he is so advised.

In the result, this application is dismissed. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. o Judge