Akhil v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MAY 2015/25TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2378 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 938/2014 OF PUTHENVELIKKARA POLICE STATION,ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ------------------------ PETITIONER/4TH ACCUSED:

---------------------------------------------- AKHIL, AGED 18 YEARS,S/O FRANCIS, KAITHATHARA HOUSE, THURUTHIPURAM, PUTHENVELIKKARA VILLAGE, N.PARAVUR.

BY ADV. SRI.P.A.MUJEEB RESPONDENTS/RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

---------------------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P. THOMAS THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No.2378 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of May 2015

ORDER

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No.938/2014 of Puthenvelikkara Police Station registered for the offences punishable under Sections 143, 147, 148, 323, 324 and 307 read with Section 149 I.P. C.

3. The allegation is that, he along with co-accused armed with deadly weapons assaulted the victim.

4. Heard.

5. There is no specific allegation against the petitioner that he had made use of any weapon. There is only a general allegation of his involvement in the incident. Some of the accused have already

B.A.2378/2015 been granted anticipatory bail by this court. There is no reason for denying it to the petitioner.

6. In the result, this Bail Application is allowed. i) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for ₹25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

(ii) He shall report before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing. (iii) He shall not destroy or tamper with the evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE dl // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE