Achan Kunju v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 20TH DAY OF MAY 2015/30TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2416 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 4/2015 OF CHAVARA POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT ------------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2, 3, 4 AND 5 :
--------------------------------------------------------
1. ACHAN KUNJU, AGED 44, S/O PETER NEDUVILLA THOPPIL PADINJATTATHIL NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM.
2. JOBINE AGED 21, S/O JOSEPH PUTHENTHOPPIL PADINJATTATHIL VEED NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM.
3. ALEX AGED 24, S/O. KUNJUMON, KUNNEL PADINJATTATHIL NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM.
4. SEBASTIAN AGED 28, S/O. RAJAN, THOPPIL PADINJATTATHIL, NEENDAKARA P.O., KOLLAM.
BY ADV. SRI.ARUN BABU COMPLAINANT/STATE :
-----------------------------------
1. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA
2. THE S.I. OF POLICE CHAVARA POLICE STATION.
R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. V.S. SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 20-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J ------------------------------------------------------------ Bail Appln.No.2416 of 2015 ------------------------------------------------------------ Dated this the 20th day of May, 2015
ORDER
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2.
Petitioners apprehend that they will be arrested by the Police in Crime No.4/2015 of Chavara Police Station registered for the offences under Sections 143,147, 148, 452, 326, 324, 427 and read with Section 149 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that they along with the co-accused armed with weapons like sticks assaulted the victims due to political enmity causing fracture of bone. The learned counsel submits that this is a false case got registered due to political enmity. 3.
Heard.
4.
Learned counsel submits that the prosecution has no case that the petitioners committed any overt acts. There is a specific allegation against the first petitioner that he used a stick to assault the victim. Moreover, the facts of the case do not justify granting anticipatory bail.
In the result, this application is dismissed. Sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE rkj //TRUE COPY// P.A. TO JUDGE