Thressiamma v. State

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MAY 2015/25TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2455 of 2015 ------------------------------- FIR IN VC1/15/TVM OF VIGILANCE AND ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPRUAM.

............

PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:

----------------------------------------- THRESSIAMMA, W/O.JOSE, AGED 46 YEARS, HOSPITAL ATTENDANT, SAT HOSPITAL, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM (UNDER SUSPENSION) RESIDING AT THRESSIAMMA BHAVAN, KURISSADY, NALANCHIRA P.O, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.B.MOHANLAL RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

--------------------------------------------- STATE, REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE VIGILANCE ANTI-CORRUPTION BUREAU, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM UNIT, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.K.K.RAJEEV THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A.No.2455 of 2015 B - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 15th day of May 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the 2nd accused in Crime No.VC 1/15/TVM of Vigilance and Anti-Corruption Bureau, Thiruvananthapuram.

3. The allegation is that, she along with the co-accused, entered into a conspiracy and pursuant to it, they made false entries in certain documents and made corrections in the relevant documents with regard to her date of birth and thus, committed the offences under Sections 13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and Sections 468, 471 and 120(B) of the I.P.C 4.

Heard.

B.A.2455/2015

5. The petitioner is working as a Nursing Assistant in S.A.T. Hospital, Thiruvananthapuram. The learned counsel submits that she is suffering from 50% disability as a result of an accident. The allegations against the petitioner are very serious. A detailed investigation is necessary to collect the evidence. Releasing the petitioner on bail, at this stage, will certainly affect the investigation. So, I am not inclined to grant her prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. In the result this bail application is dismissed. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is ready to surrender before the Investigating Officer. She may do so, if she is so advised.

sd/- K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE dl // TRUE COPY // PA TO JUDGE