Sujai v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MAY 2015/5TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2471 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 794/2015 OF MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED NO.1 & 2:
------------------------------------------------------------
1. SUJAI, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.SUKUMARAN, CHALLOPPILLIYIL HOUSE, OORAMANA P.O., KAYANADU KARA, MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM.
2. AMMINI, AGED 48 YEARS, W/O. SUKUMARAN, CHALLOPPILLIYIL HOUSE, OORAMANA P.O., KAYANADU KARA, MARADY VILLAGE, MUVATTUPUZHA, ERNAKULAM.
BY ADVS.SRI.GEO PAUL SRI.SANU MATHEW SRI.RADHIKA RAJASEKHARAN P.
SRI.C.R.PRAMOD SRI.S.ASHOK KUMAR.
SRI.LENIN P. SUKUMARAN SRI.JERRY VARGHESE RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :
--------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, KOCHI- 682 031, THROUGH SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MUVATTUPUZHA POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN- 686 661.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.R.REMA THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd.
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
............................................
B.A. No. 2471 of 2015(D) ............................................... Dated this the 26th day of May, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2. First petitioner is the husband of the first informant and second petitioner is his mother. The allegation is that they are subjected the first informant to cruelty and thus committed the offence under section 498(A) of IPC.
3. Heard.
4. There is no allegation that the first informant sustained any serious injuries. The chances of reunion cannot be ruled out. So I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. In the result, this application is allowed.
1) The petitioners shall be released on bail after interrogation on their executing a bond for Rs. Twenty five thousand only each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if they are arrested by the Police in connection with this case.
2) They shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if they are so required by him in writing.
3) They shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.
B.A. No. 2471 of 2015(D) ::2::
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. To Judge