Thresyama v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 15TH DAY OF MAY 2015/25TH VAISAKHA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 2624 of 2015 ------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 489/2015 OF MANNUTHY POLICE STATION, TRISSUR ........

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- THRESYAMA, AGED 75 YEARS, W/O.MATHEW, KOLAMBARATH HOUSE, NELLAKARA, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.RAJIT RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.JIBU P. THOMAS THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 15-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

--------------------------------------- B.A. No. 2624 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- Dated this the 15th day of May, 2015

ORDER

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the fourth accused in Crime No. 489/2015 of Mannuthy Police Station registered for the offences under Sections 120(B), 419, 420, 465, 468, 471 and 472 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegation is that she borrowed money from a Co-operative Bank producing false salary certificate of guarantors etc.

3. Learned counsel submits that she is aged 75 years and she was not aware of the commission of the offence by the other accused.

4. Heard.

5. The first accused is the petitioner's son. The alleged incident happened in 2014. The first accused is already in custody. Since the petitioner is aged 75 years, I am inclined

B.A. No. 2624 of 2015 to grant her bail.

In the result, this application is allowed.

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on her executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if she is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

2) She shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if she is so required by him in writing.

3) She shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DMR/-