Rahumath Beevi v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 27TH DAY OF MAY 2015/6TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2766 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 470/2015 OF POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION,KOLLAM DISTRICT ----------------------- PETITIONER/2ND ACCUSED:

------------------------------------------ RAHUMATH BEEVI, D/O.PAREED KUNJU, AGED 54 YEARS, RESIDING AT HARIS MANZIL, MUDIYOORKONAM, PAYYAKKODU MURI, POOYAPPALLY VILLAGE, KOTTARAKKARA TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.JOHNSON GOMEZ SRI.S.BIJU (KIZHAKKANELA) RESPONDENT/STATE :

----------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM, THROUGH THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, POOYAPPALLY POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 27-05-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.2766 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 27th day of May, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is the mother-in-law of the first informant who is the wife of the first accused. The allegation is that the accused subjected the first informant to cruelty and thus committed the offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code.

3.

Heard.

4.

The prosecution has no case that the first informant sustained any serious injuries. There are litigations between the parties concerned in the family court. This is a family matter. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. In the result, this application is allowed.

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on her executing a bond for Rs.Twenty five thousand only with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if she is arrested by the Police in connection with this

B.A. No.2766 of 2015 case.

2) She shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if she is so required by him in writing. 3) She shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge