Vinod v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2782 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.244/2014 OF CHITTAR POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT -------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ 1 & 2 ACCUSED :
---------------------------------------------------
1. VINOD, AGED 50 YEARS, S/O.SUKUMARAN, PONNUS VILLA, KARIMPALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
2. BAIJU, AGED 42 YEARS, S/O.NAKULAN, PADMALAYAM, THALAKULAM PUTHENKULAM, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SMT.G.VIDYA RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :
---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
---------------------- Bail Appl. No.2782 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
2. The petitioners are accused in Crime No.244 of 2014 of Chittar Police station. They are alleged to have committed the offences under Sec.420 and 406 read with Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that the petitioners collected various amounts from several people and stopped the business without paying back the amounts to the subscribers.
3. Heard both sides.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have already paid back the amounts to several subscribers and is ready to pay the amount due to the first informant in this case also.
5. So I am inclined to grant them anticipatory bail.
In the result, the bail application is allowed. 1) The petitioners shall be released on
Bail Appl. No.2782 of 2015 2 bail after interrogation on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if they are arrested by the Police in connection with this case.
2) The petitioners shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if they are so required by him in writing.
3) The petitioners shall furnish a bank guarantee in the court of the learned Magistrate concerned for Rs.3,60,000/- (Rupees three lakhs sixty thousand only) within two weeks failing which, the learned Magistrate shall authorise to cancel the bail.
4) The petitioners shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court of enquiry or the trial court as the case may be.
5) The petitioners shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.
6) The petitioners shall not get themselves
Bail Appl. No.2782 of 2015 3 involved in any other criminal case.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge