Vinod v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/26TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2784 of 2015 ---------------------------------------- CRIME NO.268/2014 OF KODUMON POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT ------------------- PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED :
----------------------------------------- VINOD, S/O.SUKUMARAN, AGED 50 YEARS, PONNUS VILLA, KARIMPALLOOR, KOLLAM DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SMT.G.VIDYA RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT :
---------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 16-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
Msd
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
---------------------- Bail Appl. No.2784 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 16th day of June 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is accused in Crime No.268 of 2014 of Kodumon Police station. He is alleged to have committed the offence under Sec.420 of Indian Penal Code. He was a chitty foreman. The prosecution case is that the petitioner collected various amounts from several people and stopped the business without paying back the amounts to the subscribers.
3. Heard both sides.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has already paid back the amounts to several subscribers and is ready to pay the amount due to the first informant in this case also.
5. So I am inclined to grant him anticipatory bail.
In the result, the bail application is allowed. 1) The petitioner shall be released on
Bail Appl. No.2784 of 2015 2 bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.
2) The petitioner shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.
3) The petitioner shall furnish a bank guarantee in the court of the learned Magistrate concerned for Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lakh only) within two weeks failing which, the learned Magistrate shall authorise to cancel the bail.
4) The petitioner shall not leave India without the previous permission of the court of enquiry or the trial court as the case may be.
5) The petitioner shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.
6) The petitioner shall not get himself
Bail Appl. No.2784 of 2015 3 involved in any other criminal case.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge