Sreejith T. v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2898 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 478/2015 OF VATAKARA POLICE STATION , KOZHIKODE DISTRICT --------------------- PTITIONER/ACCUSED:

----------------------------------- SREEJITH T.,AGED 32 YEARS,S/O.SASI, THAYYULLATHIL HOUSE, P.O.KEEZHAL, (VIA) VATAKARA, PIN -673 104 BY ADVS.SRI.C.VATHSALAN SRI.K.RAKESH ROSHAN SMT.THUSHARA.V RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, (IN CIRME NO.478/2015 OF VATAKARA POLICE STATION) REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-31 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

==================== B.A. No. 2898 of 2015 ==================== Dated this the 1st day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the husband of the first informant. The prosecution alleges that he misappropriated her properties and subjected her to cruelty and thus committed the offences under sections 406 and 498A of IPC.

3. Heard.

4. The petitioner is a Police Constable. The prosecution has no case that the first informant sustained any serious injuries. The Doctor noticed only a tenderness. There is a chance for reunion. So, I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner. In the result, this application is allowed .

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

2) The petitioner shall not enter the house in which the first informant is residing.

B.A. No. 2898 of 2015 ::2::

3) He shall not contact or communicate with the first informant, except with the permission of the trial court concerned.

4) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.

5) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.

6) He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal cases.

7) He shall not harass the de facto complainant or her relatives.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. To Judge