High Court of KeralaBail Appl./2900/2015partly allowed

Satheesh v. State Of Kerala

2015-06-01Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE 2015/11TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 2900 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 314/2015 OF WALAYAR POLICE STATION, PALAKKAD DISTRICT. ...........

PETITIONER/ACCSUSED NO.2:

--------------------------------------------- SATHEESH, AGED 25 YEARS, S/O.RADHAKRISHNAN, KOPPANPURA, VADUKATHARA, KANJIKODE, PALAKKAD TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

-------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 01-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

==================== B.A. No. 2900 of 2015 ==================== Dated this the 1st day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is the second accused in Crime No. 324 of 2015 of Walayar Police Station registered for the offences under sections 143, 147, 148, 324, 308 read with 149 of IPC. The prosecution case is that he along with the co-accused assaulted the victim with an iron rod, causing injury on his skull.

3. Heard.

4. Learned counsel submits that the weapon has already been recovered and the co-accused have already been granted anticipatory bail. The facts of the case, incline me to believe that custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary. In the result, this application is allowed .

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

B.A. No. 2900 of 2015 ::2::

2) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.

3) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.

4) He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal cases.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE DST //True Copy// P.A. To Judge