Mohammed v. Sub Inspector Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3023 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER OF OONNULKAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT -------------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 2 & 3 :

-----------------------------------------------

1. MOHAMMED, AGED 60, S/O.MYTHEEN, MALAIKUDIYIL HOUSE, NELLIMATTOM P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

2. RASHEEDA, AGED 60, W/O. MOHAMMED, MALAIKUDIYIL HOUSE, NELLIMATTOM P.O. ERNAKULAM DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.R.BINDU (SASTHAMANGALAM) SRI.PRASANTH M.P.

RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT & STATE :

-------------------------------------------------------------

1. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE OONNUKAL POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT, PIN-686 661.

2. STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM KOCHI-682 031.

R1 & R2 BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

----------------------------- B.A No. 3023 of 2015 --------------------------------------- Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015.

O R D E R

Petitioners apprehend that they will be arrested on the accusation that they have committed the offence under Section 498A IPC. The learned Public Prosecutor submits that no case has been registered against them at Oonukal police station and their apprehension is not reasonable. There is nothing to think that the petitioners apprehension is well founded.

In the result this application is dismissed.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE sab