George Varghese v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/14TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3032 of 2015 () ------------------------------- (FROM CRIME NO.886/CR/EOW-II/KTM/2011 OF CRIME BRANCH CID ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING II (CRIME NO. 576/2011 OF KURUPPAMPADY POLICE STATION , ERNAKULAM DISTRICT) ---------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

------------------------------------- GEORGE VARGHESE, AGED 64 YEARS, S/O.GEEVARGHESE, KARIMBUMKALAYIL HOUSE, VENGOOR KARA,VENGOOR VILLAGE, KUNNATHUNADU TALUK. BY ADVS.SRI.V.RAJENDRAN (PERUMBAVOOR) SRI.GEORGE VARGHESE KIZHAKKAMBALAM RESPONDENT(S)/STATE & COMPLAINANT:

-----------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM - 682 031.

2. DETECTIVE INSPECTOR, OFFICE OF THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CRIME BRANCH CID ECONOMIC OFFENCE WING - II KOTTAYAM- 686 001.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 04-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3032 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 4th day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner was issued a notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C.

3.

The allegation is that he has committed the offences under Section 420 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Price Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning) Act 1978. 4.

Heard.

5.

The petitioner was issued a notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C in April 2015. The date fixed for his appearance was 27.05.2015. On the previous day he filed this application for anticipatory bail. His intention is very clear. He wants to defeat the provisions in the Cr.P.C. The fact that he has been issued a notice under Section 41A Cr.P.C clearly indicates that the investigation is being conducted in an honest manner. If the investigating officer is satisfied that his arrest is not necessary for effective investigation I am sure he will not arrest him. There is no

B.A. No.3032 of 2015 room for any complaint.

In the result, this application is dismissed sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV H/o //True Copy// PA to Judge