← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./3105/2015dismissed

K.Chandran Pillai v. State Of Kerala

2015-06-12Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/22ND JYAISHTA, 1937Q Bail Appl..No. 3105 of 2015 -------------------------------------- CRIME NO. 467/2015 OF PANDALAM POLICE STATION , PATHANAMTITTA ---------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1:

----------------------------------------- K.CHANDRAN PILLAI, AGED 43 YEARS, S/O KUNJIRAMAN NAIR, THACHIRATHU CHANDRAGIRI, ELAVUMTHITTA P.O., MEZHUVELI VILLAGE, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.C.S.MANU RESPONDNET/COMPLAINANT AND THE INVESTIGATING OFFICER: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, PANDALAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT. (NOTICE TO WHOM MAY BE SERVED ON THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM).

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: PJ

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

------------------------------------------- B.A.No.3105 of 2015 ------------------------------------------- Dated this the 12th day of June, 2015

ORDER

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 143, 147,148,149,452,294(b) and 307 and Section 27 of Arms Act. 3.

The prosecution case is that the accused armed with deadly weapons like swords reached the place of occurrence on four motorcycles and assaulted the victim with the swords causing him very serious injuries. 4.

Heard.

5.

A perusal of the wound certificate of the victim shows that the victim sustained very serious injuries. There was a fracture of both bones of the left forearm. There was an incised wound in the left forearm. This makes probable the prosecution version that the assault was with swords. It is not at all proper to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. In the result, this application is dismissed. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner will surrender before the investigating officer. He may do so if he is so advised.

K.ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE pm