Rajahamsan P. v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/19TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3142 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 179/2015 OF NORTH PARAVUR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT ----------------- PETITIONER/IST ACCUSED :
----------------------------------------- RAJAHAMSAN P., AGED 38 YEARS S/O.LATE PAVITHRAN, PULICHUVATTIL HOUSE, NORTH ARYAD ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.G.PRIYADARSAN THAMPI RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT :
----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA ERNAKULAM (REPRESENTING SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE NORTH PARAVUR POLICE STATION, ERNAKULAM DISTRICT). BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 09-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
==================== B.A.No. 3142 of 2015 ............................................... Dated this the 9th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offence under section 498A IPC. The prosecution case is that he subjected his wife to cruelty.
3. Heard.
4. There is not allegation that the first informant sustained any serious injuries. The chance of reunion cannot be ruled out. So, I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner. In the result, this application is allowed .
1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.
2) The petitioner shall not enter the house in which the first informant is residing.
3) He shall not contact or communicate with the first informant, except with the permission of the trial court concerned.
B.A.No. 3142 of 2015 ::2::
4) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.
5) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.
6) He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal cases.
7) He shall not harass the de facto complainant or her relatives.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge