Ratheesh v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/21ST JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3223 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1072/2015 OF MATHILAKOM POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT ------------------- PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 3 :
------------------------------------------------
1. RATHEESH, AGED 31 YEARS S/O.BHAKTHAVALSALAN, SREEVALSAM, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD CHERPULASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
2. BHAKTHAVALSALAN, AGED 65 YEARS SREEVALSAM, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD, CHERPULASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
3. PARVATHY, AGED 57 YEARS W/O.BHAKTHAVALSALAN, SREEVALSAM, HIGH SCHOOL ROAD CHERPULASSERY P.O., OTTAPALAM TALUK, PALAKKAD DISTRICT.
BY ADV. SRI.P.JAYARAM RESPONDENT :
------------------------ STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. REMA R.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3223 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2.
First petitioner is the husband of the first informant and the 2nd and 3rd petitioners are his parents. They are alleged to have subjected her to cruelty. 3.
Heard.
4.
The prosecution has no case that the first informant sustained any serious injuries. The attempt of the court shall always be to bring back harmony to the family. If the petitioners happen to be detained, the chances will be lost. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioners for anticipatory bail.
In the result, this application is allowed.
1.
The petitioners shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each if they are arrested by the police in connection with this case.
B.A. No.3223 of 2015 2.
They shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if they are so required by him in writing. 3.
They shall not get himself involved in any other criminal case while they are on bail.
4.
They shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.
5.
They shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.
sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge