Biju G Krishnan v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 11TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/21ST JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3232 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 118/2015 OF ARANMULA POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT ---------------------- PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
------------------------------------ BIJU G. KRISHNAN S/O.GOPALAKRISHNAN, AGED 28 YEARS RESIDING AT PARAYIL HOUSE CHERUKOL MUKRI AND VILLAGE, RANNI TALUK PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.T.MADHU SRI.ROY THOMAS (PATHANAMTHITTA) RESPONDENT/STATE :
---------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA THROUGH THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER ARANMUKLA POLICE STATION PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRICT REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM-682031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 11-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3232 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 11th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2.
Petitioner is the husband of the first informant. Their marriage took place in 2011. The allegation is that in 2007 the Petitioner had kidnapped her and committed rape on her.
3.
Heard.
4.
The marriage between the Petitioner and the first informant was solemnized in 2011. The strange allegation against him is that four years before the marriage he had kidnapped her and had sexual intercourse by force. The nature of the allegations itself inclines me to grant anticipatory bail.
In the result, this application is allowed.
1.
The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each if he is arrested by the police
B.A. No.3232 of 2015 in connection with this case.
2.
He shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing. 3.
He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal case while he is on bail.
4.
He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.
5.
He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. 6.
He shall not harass the defacto complainant or her relatives.
In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.
sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge