K.Raju v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW FRIDAY, THE 12TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/22ND JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3246 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 692/2015 OF KAREELAKULANGARA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT ----------------- PETITIONERS/SOLE ACCUSED :
---------------------------------------------- K.RAJU, AGED 45 YEARS S/O.KUNJIKRISHNAN, MANALIL THEKKATHIL VALIYAKUZHI MURI, CHEPPAD VILLAGE, KARTHIKAPALLY TALUK, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.ARUN CHANDRAN SRI.MANSOOR B.H.
RESPONDENT/STATE/COMPLAINANT :
-------------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REP. BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA (THROUGH STATION HOUSE OFFICER KAREELAKULANGARA POLICE STATION, ALAPPUZHA DIST.) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI. DHANESH MATHEW MANJOORAN THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 12-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3246 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 12th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
2.
Petitioner is the husband of the first informant. He is alleged to have committed the offence under Sections 341, 323, 506(1) and 498(A) of Indian Penal Code. 3.
According to the prosecution he wrongfully restrain, assaulted and threatened her and subjected her to cruelty .
4.
Heard.
5.
There is no allegation that the first informant sustained any serious injuries. It appears that it is not impossible to bring back peace to the family. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail.
In the result, this application is allowed.
1.
The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each if he is arrested by the police
B.A. No.3246 of 2015 in connection with this case.
2.
He shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing. 3.
He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal case while he is on bail.
4.
He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.
5.
He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.
sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge