Shibin v. The State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/27TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No.3347 of 2015 ------------------------------------- CRIME NO.949/2015 OF KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION,TRISSUR. ..
PETITIONER'S/ACCUSED NO.2,3, AND 4:
----------------------------------------------------------- 1.
SHIBIN,AGED 32 YEARS,S/O.PURUSHOTTAMAN, KURUPPATH HOUSE,KAZHIMBRAM BEACH DESOM, VALAPPAD VILLAGE,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
2.
SUBEESH,AGED 28 YEARS,S/O.SURAN, KOZHIPARAMBIL HOUSE,PERINJANAM WEST DESAM, PERINJANAM VILLAGE,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
3.
SUDHEESH,AGED 36 YEARS,S/O.KARUNAKARAN, VALIYAPARAMBIL HOUSE,KAIPAMANGALAM DESOM, KAIPAMANGALAM VILLAGE,THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.RAAJESH S.SUBRAHMANIAN SRI.V.R.RAJESH RESPONDENT/STATE:
--------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESETNED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA,ERNAKULAM-682031.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA.R THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
---------------------- Bail Appl. No.3347 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of June 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioners are accused in Crime No.949 of 2015 of Kodungallur Police station. They have been in custody since 18.04.2015. The allegation is that they have committed the offences under Secs.427, 447, 435, 436, 452, 354, 120(b), 109 and 506(ii) read with Sec.34 of Indian Penal Code.
3. Heard both sides.
4. It is submitted that final report has already been filed.
5. Having regard to the nature of offences further detention of the petitioners in not necessary. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioners. In the result, the bail application is allowed.
1. The petitioners will be released on bail on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) each with
Bail Appl. No.3347 of 2015 2 two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned.
2. They shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall they get themselves involved in any other criminal case.
3. They shall not destroy or attempt to destroy the evidence or interfere with the investigation.
If the petitioners violate any of the above conditions, the court of enquiry/trial is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge