Dileep Kumar v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/27TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 3355 of 2015 ----------------------------------- CRIME NO. 194/2015 OF PANDALAM POLICE STATION, PATHANAMTITTA .......

PETITIONER(S):

----------------------- DILEEP KUMAR, AGED 32 YEARS, S/O.NARAYANAN NAIR, RAJIV BHAVAN, KOZHUVALLOOR, MULAKKUZHA, ALAPPUZHA DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.K.K.SETHUKUMAR RESPONDENT(S):

------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM, (CR. NO 194 OF 2015 PANDALAM POLICE STATION) BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA R.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3355 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 17th day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 454, 427, 506(2) & 34 of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The prosecution case is that he along with the co-accused trespassed into the house of the first informant threatened him and committed mischief.

4.

Heard.

5.

The offences alleged against the petitioner are not of a serious nature. The co-accused have already been granted bail. The petitioner also is entitled to bail. In the result, this application is allowed.

1.

The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties for the like sum each he is arrested by the police in connection with this case.

B.A. No.3355 of 2015 2.

He shall appear before the Investigating Officer between 10.30 a.m and 11.30 a.m on every Wednesday for 2 months or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier. 3.

He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal case while he is on bail.

4.

He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.

5.

He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge