Anwar v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 17TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/27TH JYAISHTA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3379 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1263/2015 OF KODUNGALLUR POLICE STATION, TRISSUR DISTRICT ------------------ PETITIONER/ACCUSED :
-------------------------------------- ANWAR, S/O.KASIM, AGED 43 YEARS MATHILAKATH HOUSE, KANDAMKULAM DESOM METHALA VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.
BY ADVS.SRI.M.SHAJU PURUSHOTHAMAN SRI.K.S.RAJESH RESPONDENTS/COMPLAINANT :
------------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM REPRESENTING THE S.I. OF POLICE, KODUNGALLUR BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. REMA R.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 17-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: Mn
K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.
---------------------- Bail Appl. No.3379 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 17th day of June 2015
O R D E R
Petition filed under Sec.439 Cr.P.C.
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.1263 of 2015 of Kodungallur Police station. He is alleged to have committed the offences under Secs.435 and 436 of Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that, he set fire to a motor cycle kept in the shed of the first informant causing him a loss of Rs.25,000/-.
3. Heard both sides.
4. The investigation is over and final report has already been filed. Further detention of the petitioner is not necessary for effective investigation.
In the result, the bail application is allowed.
1. The petitioner will be released on bail on his executing a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the learned Magistrate concerned.
Bail Appl. No.3379 of 2015 2
2. The petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer between 10.30 a.m. and 11.30 a.m. on every Friday for three months, or till the final report is filed, whichever is earlier.
3. He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses, nor shall he get himself involved in any other criminal case.
4. He shall not destroy or attempt to destroy the evidence or interfere with the investigation.
If the petitioner violates any of the above conditions, the court of enquiry/trial is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.
Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge