Parapilayil Muhammed v. Sub Insepctor Of Police

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3491 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 507/2015 OF VALANCHERRY POLICE STATION, MALAPPURAM DISTRICT. ......

PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

---------------------------------- PARAPILAYIL MUHAMMED, AGED 31 YEARS, S/O.IBRAHIM VAIKATHUR, PACHIRI, VALANCHERI P.O, MALAPPURAM.

BY ADVS.SRI.K.J.SAJI ISAAC DR.ELIZABETH VARKEY RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

---------------------------------------------- SUB INSEPCTOR OF POLICE, VALANCHERRY, REP. BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA.R THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3491 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 341, 323, 354 and 506(ii) of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The prosecution case is that he wrongfully restrained the victim assaulted her, outraged her modesty and threatened her.

4.

Heard.

5.

The first informant did not sustain any serious injuries. This essentially appears to be an assault case though Section 354 of Indian Penal Code also finds a place in the First Information Report. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail. In the result, this application is allowed.

1.

The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent

B.A. No.3491 of 2015 sureties for the like sum each if he is arrested by the police in connection with this case.

2.

He shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing. 3.

He shall not get themselves involved in any other criminal case while he is on bail.

4.

He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.

5.

He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge