Suresh v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE 2015/2ND ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl.No. 3493 of 2015 ------------------------------------ CRIME NO. 1246/2015 OF MATHILAKOM POLICE STATION, TRISSUR .......

PETITIONER(S)/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- SURESH, AGED 46 YEARS, S/O.VELAYUDHAN, KIZHAKKEDATHU HOUSE, PERINJANAM WEST DESOM, PERINJANAM VILLAGE, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADV. SRI.NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT(S)/COMPLAINANT:

----------------------------------------------- STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT.REMA R.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 23-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING: msv/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3493 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 23rd day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner is alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 452, 323, 324, 354, and 34 of Indian Penal Code.

3.

The prosecution case is that he assaulted the victim with an iron rod and outraged her modesty. 4.

Heard.

5.

The first informant did not sustain any serious injuries though she was allegedly assaulted with an iron rod. Though there is an allegation that her modesty was outraged it appears that this is essentially an assault case. Custodial interrogation of the Petitioner is not necessary for effective investigation.

In the result, this application is allowed.

1.

The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent

B.A. No.3493 of 2015 sureties for the like sum each if he is arrested by the police in connection with this case.

2.

He shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing. 3.

He shall not get himself involved in any other criminal case while he is on bail.

4.

He shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.

5.

He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.

sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge