← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./3522/2015dismissed

Sujith Lal v. The State Of Kerala

2015-06-24Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW WEDNESDAY, THE 24TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/3RD ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3522 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 372/2015 OF VARANTHARAPPILLY POLICE STATION, THRISSUR DISTRICT ------------------ PETITIONERS/ACCUSED 1 TO 7:

---------------------------------------------------

1. SUJITH LAL ,AGED 32 YEARS, S/O SUGATHAN, MULLA HOUSE, VELOOPADAM, VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

2. SUMAN, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O SUGATHAN, MULLA HOUSE, VELOOPADAM, VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE, CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

3. VINOD, AGED 35 YEARS, S/O SUGATHAN, MULLA HOUSE, VELOOPADAM, VARANTHARAPPILLY VILLAGE,CHALAKUDY TALUK, THRISSUR DISTRICT.

BY ADVS.SRI.G.SREEKUMAR (CHELUR) SRI.N.L.BITTO STAE OF KERALA/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------------ THE STATE OF KERALA, REP. BY THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, VARANTHARAPPILLY POLICE STATION, THROUGH THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM-682 031.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 24-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - B.A. No.3522 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 24th day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioners are alleged to have committed the offences under Sections 324, 341 of Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3.

The prosecution case is that at 8 in the night on 21.05.2015 they wrongfully restrained the first informant and assaulted him with brick and swords causing him serious injuries.

4.

Heard.

5.

The victim sustained serious injuries on his face. The accused are members of a family. It is very clear that they had some hidden motive for the attack; it was a premedicated one. It is not proper to grant them anticipatory bail In the result, this application is dismissed. sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV