Prasanth @C.C.Prasanth v. State Of Kerala

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW THURSDAY, THE 25TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/4TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3574 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 1582/2014 OF NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION. .......

PETITIONER/1ST ACCUSED:

---------------------------------------- PRASANTH @C.C.PRASANTH, AGED 36 YEARS, S/O. VIJAYAKUMAR, REVATHI VILASOM MANCHA, THEKKUMKARA MURI, KARUPPUR VILLAGE, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM.

BY ADV. SRI.M.R.SARIN RESPONDENT(S):

-------------------------

1. STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

2. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, NEDUMANGAD POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 25-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

mbr/

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

==================== B.A.No. 3574 of 2015 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Dated this the 25th day of June, 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C.

2.

Petitioner has allegedly committed the offences under Sections 354, 392, 394, and 34 of IPC. The prosecution case is that while the first informant was walking along a road, the petitioner along with the co-accused pushed her down and robbed her of Rs.5000/- 3.

Heard.

4.

Learned counsel submits that the petitioner has been in custody since 08.06.2015 and he may be granted bail. The modus operandi of the petitioner speaks volumes. Recovery has not been effected. It is not in public interest to grant him bail. In the result, this application is dismissed. Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, JUDGE DST //True copy// P.A. To Judge