Vikash Surendran v. State Of Kerala
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT:
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW TUESDAY, THE 30TH DAY OF JUNE 2015/9TH ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No.3618 of 2015 ------------------------------- CRIME NO.693/2015 OF SASTHAMCOTTA POLICE STATION,KOLLAM. APPLICANT'S/ACCUSED:
------------------------------------ 1.
VISAKH SURENDRAN,AGED 29 YEARS, S/O.SURENDRAN.G,SOUMYA BHAVAN, THEPPUPARA P.O.,EZHAMKULAM,ADOOR, PATHANAMTHITTA.
SURENDRAN.G,AGED 57 YEARS,SOUMYA BHAVAN, THEPPUPARA P.O.,EZHAMKULAM, ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA.
RAMANY.N,AGED 55 YEARS,W/O.SURENDRAN.G, SOUMYA BHAVAN,THEPPUPARA P.O.
EZHAMKULAM,ADOOR,PATHANAMTHITTA.
BY ADVS.SRI.KRISHNA PRASAD.S SRI.B.SIBI SRI.NOBEL RAJU RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:
--------------------------------------------- THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, REPRESENTING THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SASTHAMKOTTAH POLICE STATION.
BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH.
THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 30-06-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
pk
K.ABRAHAM MATHEW, J ----------------------------- B.A.No.3618 OF 2015 ----------------------------- Dated this the 30th day of June, 2015
O R D E R
----------- Petition filed under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
Petitioners are alleged to have committed the offence under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code.
They are parents-in-law of the first informant. The prosecution case is that they subjected the first informant to cruelty.
4.
Heard.
5.
The first informant did not sustain any physical injuries. It appears that restoration of peace to the family is possible. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioners for bail.
In the result, this application is allowed.
1.
The petitioners shall be released on bail after interrogation on their executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty five thousand only) each with two solvent sureties for the like sum each if they are arrested by the police in connection with this case.
B.A.No.3618 OF 2015 They shall appear before the investigating officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.
They shall not get themselves involved in any other criminal case while they are on bail.
4.
They shall not intimidate or attempt to influence the witnesses.
5.
They shall not destroy or tamper with evidence. In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with law.
If the petitioners surrender before the magistrate, this order is not applicable and the learned Magistrate may pass appropriate orders.
sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE R.AV //True Copy// PA to Judge