← Library
High Court of KeralaBail Appl./3624/2015allowed

Ajith v. State Of Kerala

2015-07-13Honourable Mr. Justice K.Abraham Mathew3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM

PRESENT:

THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE K.ABRAHAM MATHEW MONDAY, THE 13TH DAY OF JULY 2015/22ND ASHADHA, 1937 Bail Appl..No. 3624 of 2015 () ------------------------------- CRIME NO. 584/2015 OF PUTHOOR POLICE STATION, KOLLAM DISTRICT ------------------ PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

-------------------------------------- AJITH, AGED 24 YEARS, S/O.RAJU, MAVILA VEEDU, PULLAMALA, THEVALAPPURAM, NEDUVATHOOR, KOTTARAKARA, KOLLAM.

BY ADV. SRI.SYAM J SAM RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT:

------------------------------------------------ STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KERALA, ERNAKULAM.

BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SRI.V.S.SREEJITH THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 13-07-2015, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY PASSED THE FOLLOWING:

sts

K. ABRAHAM MATHEW, J.

---------------------- B.A. No.3624 of 2015 -------------------------------------------- Dated this the 13th day of July 2015

O R D E R

Petition filed under Sec.438 Cr.P.C.

2. Petitioner is accused in Crime No.584 of 2015 of Puthoor Police station registered for the offences under Secs.294(b), 324 and 452 of the Indian Penal Code. The prosecution case is that, he trespassed into the house of the victim, uttered obscene words and assaulted her.

3. Heard both sides.

4. The victim did not sustain any serious injuries. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not necessary for effective investigation. So I am inclined to grant the prayer of the petitioner.

In the result, the bail application is allowed.

1) The petitioner shall be released on bail after interrogation on his executing a bond for Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum if he is arrested by the Police in connection with this case.

B.A. No.3624 of 2015 2

2) He shall appear before the Investigating Officer for interrogation if he is so required by him in writing.

3) He shall not destroy or tamper with evidence.

4) He shall not intimidate or influence the witnesses nor shall he get himself involved in any other criminal case.

In case of violation of any of the above conditions, the learned Magistrate is empowered to cancel the bail in accordance with the law.

If the petitioner surrenders before the Magistrate, this order is not applicable and the learned Magistrate may pass appropriate orders.

Sd/- K. ABRAHAM MATHEW JUDGE / True Copy / NS P.A. To Judge